# Choke Input Capacitor Input Power Supply

# Choke Input and Capacitor Input Power Supplies

Building a CW (and possibly AM) transmitter

at this link, I decided to

use a choke input supply. Had I used custom components, my first choice would

have been a good capacitor input supply.

Being a typical “cheap ham”, my decision to use a choke was based on using

readily available salvaged power transformers.

My collection of power transformers are largely pulled from old equipment I’ve scrapped.

Like many of us, my home project transformers are usually not specially ordered for a particular project. My transformers were

mostly harvested from old

gear with vacuum tube rectifiers.

**Apparent and Normal Power Factor**

You probably never heard of this or considered it, but power factor causes

some very strange effects in a power supply. Regular power factor is where the

current and voltage are not in phase, and so the current times voltage no longer

tells us the real power of the system. This is reactive power, and can even be

called “VAR power” or volt-amperes reactive power. A transformer with

significant flux leakage or that has a secondary loaded with an inductive or

capacitive load has phase shift between voltage and current. This causes the

primary to appear reactive and not resistive. This increases heating in

components for a given amount of real power load.

Capacitor input supplies, or supplies with inadequate filter choke

inductance, have a different problem. They draw significant current only over a

small portion of the AC cycle. This causes the peak to average current to spread

further apart, and this can greatly increase heating and losses because of I^2R

losses in conductors and components. These systems are also known as

non-linear loads.

The high peak current and low average current loading, or non linear load, is

why we cannot measure line voltage to determine line voltage regulation with a

large capacitor input supply. This is why normal wiring voltage-drop tables or

resistance calculations do not apply with high power capacitor input supplies,

like modern kilowatt-level RF amplifiers.

You can read about power factor and non-linear loads at

this

external link.

### Tube-type High Vacuum Rectifiers

Transformers used in vacuum tube rectification systems almost always have

higher primary and secondary resistances than transformers used with

solid state rectifier systems. There is a good reason for this. Vacuum tube rectifiers are much “softer” on the

secondary than solid state rectifiers. With their high plate resistance, high

vacuum rectifiers pull current over a fairly significant fraction of the sine

wave. This results in fairly lower harmonic levels, and a bit less apparent

power factor. The softer waveform reduces transformer stress for a given

load power.

**Choke Input Supplies**

Some equipment also uses choke input supplies.

An input choke reduces the peak current by increasing the time current is drawn

from the transformer. This reduces apparent power factor and stresses even

further than the already “soft” rectification of a high vacuum rectifier.

### Capacitor Input Supplies

Capacitor input supplies, especially those using solid state rectifiers and

low ESR (equivalent secondary resistance) transformers, operate with very high

* apparent power factor*. Current is drawn only

during brief periods near AC waveform peaks, when transformer voltage exceeds

the voltage stored in the filter capacitor at the output of the rectifiers. This

makes the peak current very high compared to average current. The heavy peak

loading squares off the sine wave, and harmonics are produced. The waveform is

no longer a sine wave, the ratio of peak current to average current is very

high, so we cannot use the more traditional

**Displacement power factor applies to reactive loads**

*displacement*

power factor.power factor.

that shift or “displace” the relationship of current and voltage, not to loads

that distort waveform shape or load the line only at voltage crests.

### Transformer and “Rectifier Side” Component Heating

The rectifier side of a power supply system, the area before filtering takes

place, has a varying waveform that almost always is not sine-shaped. This means

it contains harmonics. Standard RMS conversions or averaging of current levels

cannot be applied through Ohm’s law to determine component heating. Unless the

filtering sections have a large filter choke, current generally has high peaks

with shorter than normal duration. Most of the load energy is extracted from the

transformer over a very short period of time. High-peak short-duration current

waveforms greatly increase loss (meaning more heat) in any

resistance. The standard P = I²R formula,

when using dc load or average current, no longer applies!

Let’s assume we have

a typical 1-amp load capacitor-input supply that is power from a high-quality low-resistance

power source. If we add a 30-ohm resistance on the AC side of the filter

capacitance, we might assume the heat would be 30 watts, based on P =

I²R. We might expect, since 1²*30 = 30,

that resistor heat would be 30 watts.

In fact a high quality source in a fairly stiff supply with a series 30-ohm

resistor someplace the AC side of the filter capacitor could easily produce 60

or more watts of heat in the 30 ohm resistor with an average load current of

only 1 ampere.

### Replacing Vacuum Tube Rectifier with Solid State Diodes to Reduce

Transformer Heat

This all raises an important point. We sometimes hear claims that replacing a

vacuum tube rectifier with silicon rectifiers extends transformer life of

“marginally sized transformers”. This idea is often based on reduced filament

load significantly reducing transformer heating because “10 watts of transformer

load is removed”. This is generally not the case! Removing 5 volts at 2 amps

actually has the following effect on the transformer:

Most energy passes through a traditional power transformer, with only a small

percentage of energy turned to heat. High apparent power factor loads, like the

load produced by a capacitor input filter system, produce a great deal more heat

in the transformer than resistive loads. We don’t save as much heat as we thing

by removing a low power resistive load, while higher power loads exist,

especially the HV secondary load with a high apparent power factor.

Transformer heat caused by the filament load is a little less than the

filament current times the difference between no-load and full load rectifier

filament winding voltage. Let’s say removing a 5U4 rectifier results in filament

winding voltage increasing from 5 to 5.4 volts. The voltage drop in this case is

0.4 volts, and current is 2 amperes. Replacing the 5U4 with a silicon rectifier

removes some amount less than 0.4*2 = .8 watts of heat. Convection and radiant

heat might contribute another one watt maximum of heat applied externally to the

transformer, so we save somewhat less than 2 watts of heat (counting the radiant

heat) in a component already dissipating 10-30 watts. Much of that radiant heat

would be added back in with any additional dropping resistors or with higher

dissipation in other components from increased high voltage.

The real problem is a solid state rectifier has a very sharp transition into

and out of conduction….as well as a very low on resistance. This greatly increases PFa

(the apparent power factor) of the HV secondary and primary windings. Since the

solid state rectifier has a harder turn-on and much lower “on” resistance than a

tube, power factor increases on a much higher load power winding. This more than

offsets the savings in heat produced by removing the rectifier filament’s

resistive load.

Heating generally is reduced only in choke input supplies, because the

addition of semiconductor rectifiers won’t change power factor much in a choke

input supply. Transformer heating can actually increase when high vacuum

rectifier tubes are swapped to solid state in a capacitor input supply, because

the apparent power factor becomes worse.

### Using Surplus Transformers

There are several ways to alter voltage from a transformer. ESR resistors in

the drawings below represent transformer ESR.

Let’s consider a

typical 700-volt center tapped winding:

Voltage Doublers

This system produces a dc output voltage around

2.8 times secondary RMS voltage. This system will produce around

**198****0 volts dc no load**. This more than doubles secondary

winding heating for a given load power because peak current is increased. The

secondary has dc voltage superimposed on it with common doubler schemes,

increasing chances of insulation failure. The voltage doubler also provides half

voltage, or **990 volts dc**, but it is only suitable for light loads because the

900 volt point is only halfwave rectification. Transformer heating due to ESR represented by the two 30-ohm resistors.

A voltage doubler like this also places transformer secondary insulation

under stress, with 2200 volts peak voltage between windings and 2000 volts to

ground possible.

This is a spice model of a 700V RMS transformer doubler circuit. Load is 150

watts. R4 represents transformer ESR, and so the dissipation in R4 will be

the transformer heat.

High voltage load current is 81.45 mA. Many people think heat in R4 is simply

I^2*R, but that is not true. With a capacitor input supply there is an apparent

power factor that makes heating more than expected. In this case, with a 81.45mA

150 watt load, we might assume heating is 0.4 watts in R4 (the transformer). In

fact the average transformer heat is almost **10****
watts**. This is because RMS current in R4 (transformer loses),

appearing in short pulses, is about 400 mA RMS!

Output voltage is **1.833 kV**.

Transformer current in voltage doubler results in pulses of heat that are

very large.

This would also be the waveform of transformer current.

Under revision…..

**Bridge Supply**

We can use a full wave bridge across the entire secondary with a capacitor

input supply. Supply dc voltage is about 1.4 times RMS voltage. Power factor is

not greatly increased, so heating is proportionally about the same for the same

load power as a grounded center tap system. This system will produce around **
1000 volts dc**. As a bonus, the center tap can provide

**500 volts**dc if filtered as shown! No additional

components

are required, and the center tap voltage is full wave rectified.

In this case with 150 watts into the load, heating in R4 and R5, the

combination representing the same 60 ohm secondary ESR, is 8.46 watts total. We

have saved a little heat with the same load power and the same transformer by

going from a doubler to a full wave bridge.

This tells us the idea we can get twice the power from a given transformer by

going to a doubler is wrong. We really should run, for the same heat, about 80%

of the power. What it means is we can’t get extra power from a given transformer

by using a doubler, we actually get a little less.

This is the half-power of the transformer in the bridge. This is the power in

R4. Total heat is represented by the total power in both R4 and R5.

This would also be the waveform of the transformer current.

The repetitious peak transformer secondary current is 1.52 amperes to deliver

158 mA to the load. This is about a 10:1 ratio of peak to average current.

**Full Wave Bridge with Choke**

We can use a full wave bridge across the entire secondary with a choke input

supply. Supply dc voltage is about 0.9 times applied RMS voltage with enough

filter choke reactance. Power factor is greatly reduced, so heating is

proportionally much less for the same load power as a capacitor input system.

This system will produce around 900 volts dc for load currents greater than

critical value. If the filter choke is place on the grounded side of the bridge

rectifier, or a second choke is used there, dc voltage is reduced at the center

tap. A properly designed supply could produce **900 and 450
volts**. Power factor is low, reducing transformer heating for a given

load power.

We can use a grounded center tap full wave rectifier with a capacitor input

filter. This system produces around 1.4 times the center tap to outer lead RMS

voltage at the load. The 1000 VCT transformer will produce around **
700 volts** with light loads.

We can use a full-wave grounded center tap rectifier system with a choke

input filter system. Supply dc voltage is about 0.9 times the half-winding RMS

voltage with enough filter choke reactance. Power factor is greatly reduced, so

heating is proportionally much less for the same load power as a capacitor input

system. This system will produce around **450 volts dc
**for load currents greater than critical value. Power factor is low, reducing

transformer heating for a given load power.

With this single 1000-V CT transformer using different common rectifier and filter

systems, we have a choice of 2800, 1400, 900, 700, or 450 volts.

This supply moves the choke into the negative rectifier lead so I can extract

bias from the AC voltage appearing across the choke. I’ve done this in a Globe

Scout and it works OK.

This is a full wave bridge that uses the transformer center tap to obtain

half voltage for the low level stages and screen grids of the PA tube. R1 is the

HV load, R2 the low voltage load, and R3 the bias system.

Diodes are conventional 1N4007’s in a typical supply.

120 Vac Line | Extra choke, 50K bleeder HV, Resonant choke | |||||||

Load Ohms | Load Power | Load Ma | HV | LV | ESR | ERS2 | ESR3 | Sag % |

50000 | 8 | 12 | 617 | 325 | ||||

25000 | 15 | 24 | 605 | 307 | 1012 | -0.5 | ||

20000 | 18 | 30 | 602 | 317 | 508 | 0.0 | ||

15000 | 24 | 40 | 601 | 319 | 100 | 252 | 0.2 | |

10000 | 35 | 60 | 595 | 313 | 309 | 238 | 283 | 1.2 |

8000 | 44 | 74 | 590 | 301 | 351 | 327 | 275 | 2.0 |

5000 | 67 | 115 | 577 | 280 | 312 | 322 | 319 | 4.3 |

3333 | 92 | 167 | 555 | 262 | 430 | 377 | 374 | 8.5 |

2500 | 117 | 216 | 540 | 255 | 303 | 368 | 351 | 11.5 |

1700 | 153 | 300 | 510 | 249 | 357 | 337 | 363 | 18.0 |

1200 | 190 | 398 | 477 | 240 | 338 | 347 | 338 | 26.2 |